Sunday, June 18, 2017

Robert De Niro Was Client Of Prostitution Ring That Used Children












Robert De Niro was a client of an international prostitution ring that hired underage children and specialized in providing prostitutes to wealthy, high-profile clients. 
[ynw] According to court records from 1998, Independent journalist John Lichfield discovered that the prostitution agency routinely ensnared girls as young as 15, forcing them to have sex with Hollywood’s rich and powerful elite.
While it is not clear whether or not De Niro was supplied with underage girls, his involvement in the ring received little to no media coverage.
Dcclothesline.com reports: The French Brigade de Repression de Proxenetisme (the equivalent of the Vice Squad) traced 89 young women who said they had been tricked or sometimes physically constrained by the agency into working for them. The girls were sometimes “sold on like cattle” to other call-girl agencies.
The agency’s files of clients’ names seized by the police are said to include many well-known members of the sports and show-business jet-set on both sides of the Atlantic, Arab princes, as well as two senior French center-right politicians.
Lichfield wrote:
“Six people are charged with the running of an international prostitution ring, whose call-girls entertained the actor Robert de Niro, the former tennis player, Wojtek Fibak, two senior (but unnamed) French politicians and several Gulf princes. The agency specialized in tricking, or trapping, star-struck teenage girls into selling their bodies with the promise of careers as models or actresses….
De Niro, despite a much publicized ‘arrest’ in Paris while filming a movie earlier this year, was questioned only as a witness and occasional client of the network’s prostitutes. He is suing the investigating magistrate, Frederic N’Guyen Duc Quang, following his highly publicized interrogation; the actor’s lawyers accuse the investigator of deliberate publicity-seeking.”
Sources: independentirishtimes

Friday, June 16, 2017

Katy Perry Collapses As Mk-Ultra Mind Control Breakdown Goes Viral











Footage has emerged of Katy Perry collapsing and being dragged off stage after an incoherent rant, as insiders warn she is set to be the latest Mk-Ultra controlled Victim to suffer a public meltdown.
[ynw] During a live performance of her early hit I Kissed A Girl, Katy Perry’s eyes rolled back in her head and she began making strange, guttural grunting noises before she collapsed and was dragged off stage by a member of her security team.
A different video released this week also went viral on social media after the pop star revealed signs of typical Monarch mind control split personality, explaining that she cut off her hair so she “doesn’t look like Katy Perry anymore
During the interview, Perry, whose real name is Katheryn Hudson, breaks down in tears while describing the internal conflict between her Katy Perry and Katheryn Hudson personas.
Watch the video below:
According to Vice, Monarch mind control, a practice widely used by the Walt Disney Corporation and Teen Nick to monetise and sexualise young starlets.
Supposedly developed in its current form by the C.l.A. to subdue American citizens, Monarch mind control is being used by the Hollywood industrial complex to micro-manage child stars. The Monarch mind control victims are called kittens and the executives and managers that control them are known as handlers.
The handlers take a precocious kitten, such as an All That era Amanda Bynes, and subject her to mental and sexual abuse until her personality fractures and separates like a Horcrux, making her unquestioning and compliant.
The handlers then conclude the abuse with a weird Adams Family Values summer camp punishment, where the kitten watches The Wizard of Oz over and over again till submitting to her handlers gives her true happiness.
After she turns 18, the handlers repeat these steps to transform her from a manageable performer into a highly profitable object of fantasy.
Usually – and rather shockingly – this goes off without a hitch. But in some cases, the young performer can’t stand the confusing transition from tween star to men’s magazine cover girl and starts to malfunction like the robot she has essentially become.
This, of course, resembles the 2007 meltdown of Britney Spears.

Opposite of 9/11: Two Buildings in 48 Hours Engulfed in Flames, Neither Collapse into Own Footprint











By: Claire Bernish via thefreethoughtproject.com
London’s Grenfell Tower burned for over 24 hours, a massive and deadly blaze so intense, it swiftly charred nearly the entire 1,000-unit structure — consuming newly-installed aluminum outer panels and virtually anything in its path — leaving at least 17 dead, injuring scores more, and igniting a political firestorm in the process.
But the 24-story building — its apartments gutted beyond repair — did not crumble into its own footprint.
It’s still standing.
In fact, according to several reports from the fire brigade on scene, several small fires inside Grenfell Tower remained smoldering well into today — the residential building’s charred sarcophagus now being investigated to determine cause — meaning, firefighters adhering to stringent safety precautions are perusing the severely crippled structure.
And it still hasn’t collapsed — nor should it have — because that would be nearly unprecedented. Nearly.
That the silhouette of Grenfell Tower still graces the skyline above its upscale neighborhood demands a telling comparison to a structure — World Trade Center Tower 7 — which free fell into its own footprint, as putative experts claimed in conclusion of investigations into the attacks of September 11, 2001.
Building 7, or WTC 7, has featured prominently in so-called conspiracy theories pertaining to the attacks as it stands — pardon the pun — one of the only steel-framed, concrete structures to have supposedly succumbed to office fires and collapsed straight to the ground, disintegrating into a pile of rubble.
Of course, why and how Building 7 collapsed, at all, remains a subject fraught with disputation — the 47-floor office complex experienced several smaller fires, as it sat in the shadow of the twin towers, which had taken direct hits from two commercial airlines flown by terrorists intent on bringing the buildings down.
But just seven hours into the myriad conflagrations, the office tower suddenly went into freefall — descending in seconds to its grave, despite a steel frame undamaged by airplanes or other falling structures — baffling countless architects and engineers.
“At 5:20 PM, the 47-story WTC 7 fell completely and symmetrically into its own footprint in the manner of a textbook controlled demolition,” Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth wrote earlier this year. “Seven years later, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) concluded that the collapse was due to normal office fires (which had never before brought down a steel-frame high-rise). But today thousands of architects and engineers are calling for a new investigation.”
While the suggestion the building more likely suffered a surreptitious, controlled demolition might seem conducive to tinfoil hats, the fact WTC 7 did not appear to experience major structural damage prior to its crumbling has not been sufficiently explained, to this day.
Because, the fact remains, towering structures — even those constructed back in the 1970s, like Grenfell Tower, circa 1974 — were engineered and built according to specifications ensuring even all-consuming fires could still facilitate escape to safety by as many people as possible.
Indeed, steel-framed high-rises should endure veritably anything, and while Grenfell Tower apparently lacked building-wide smoke detectors and sprinkler systems — among other ultimately fatal scrimps — the structure’s extensive fire damage did not cause an additional catastrophic collapse.
All 83 structural, vertical support columns, as architects and engineers from New Zealand noted, would have to have been severed at the same time to force such a collapse.
Were reports concluding Building 7 fell to the ground because office fires truly accurate, Grenfell Tower — consumed with intensely hot flames, estimated between 700 and 1,000 degrees centigrade, for over a day — should have suffered a similar fate, falling into its own footprint, 24 floors crushing into one another on its way to the ground.
It didn’t — nor did The Address Downtown Dubai, when an electrical fire set alight the 63-story structure, igniting a colossal inferno on New Year’s Eve in 2015.
The Address didn’t collapse — in fact, it’s not only still standing, its structural integrity remained intact enough to be restored and is in use today.
Another monstrous fire in a Lanzhou skyscraper, in China’s Gansu Province, last Sunday also failed to demolish the building.
Building 7, thus, stands as a veritable lone testament — a sore thumb — among numerous other all-consuming blazes tragically taking human, but not structural, victims.
So, while Grenfell Tower’s burnt-out frame still haunts the London-area skyline, its demolishment seems likely only to come from a planned, structural, controlled demolition — should one be planned.
Yet, World Trade Center 7 — which incidentally housed offices of the CIA, the IRS, the U.S. Secret Service, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and other prominent government and banking establishments — will never again grace new postcards displaying the iconic skyline of New York City.
This article originally appeared on thefreethoughtproject.com.

Floyd Mayweather vs. Conor McGregor Are Booked to Fight at The MGM Grand August 26




















By: Timothy Rapp via bleacherreport.com
Boxing legend Floyd Mayweather Jr. and MMA superstar Conor McGregor announced they would be fighting on Aug. 26 in what promises to be one of the most intriguing matchups in fight history.
Kevin Iole of Yahoo Sports first reported the fight had been agreed to by both Mayweather and McGregor. Mayweather then confirmed on Instagram.
Dana White said on Instagram that the fight will be at 154 pounds and take place at T-Mobile Arena, per MMAFighting.com.
Mayweather, 40, retired from boxing in Sept. 2015 after defeating Andre Berto and moving to 49-0 in his professional fighting career. But he continued to hint at a possible return to the ring and told FightHype.com in May 2016 that he was considering a bout against an MMA fighter.
That fighter ultimately ended up being McGregor, 28, the UFC lightweight champion. McGregor is 21-3 in his professional fighting career (9-1 in the UFC) and has ascended to superstardom in the sport.
The two fighters engaged in a long, often-public negotiation over the ensuing months. McGregor’s contract with the UFC and Mayweather’s lofty expectations for his payout made putting together this superfight particularly complicated.
Now, however, McGregor will face Mayweather in what could be the most lucrative fight for both superstars in their respective careers.



That doesn’t mean it will actually be a great fight. It’s possible it will be a lopsided boxing match in favor of Mayweather—who is considered to be one of the greatest boxers of all time—though comedian and MMA analyst Joe Rogan said in May 2016 that it’s possible McGregor could make things interesting, as he revealed on his podcast (via Jed Meshew of MMA Fighting):
“One of the things we know about Conor is he has a ridiculous belief in himself and he has unbelievable power. One of the things we know about Floyd is he’s [40]. So when a guy turns [40], you never know. For every guy like Bernard Hopkins, there’s a bunch of guys where the wheels just fall off and all of a sudden they can’t take a punch anymore and they can’t fight anymore, they don’t move good anymore. But I can’t imagine a world where he’s not light years past Conor with boxing skill.”
That last line seems the most prescient. Mayweather showed little sign of decline later in his career, and his tactical, defensive style of fighting likely aided his longevity in the fighting game. It’s unlikely Mayweather would ever engage in the sort of brawl McGregor would need to defeat Money.
But in the ring, anything is possible, and McGregor is no slouch. Still, much like he would have a dramatic advantage in an MMA fight against Mayweather, it’s hard to imagine Mayweather won’t have a significant advantage in a boxing match.
The world will finally get the definitive answer when Mayweather and McGregor square off on Aug. 26.

Meet The “Iranian Hulk” Who Wants To Fight ISIS









A 24-year-old Iranian bodybuilder named Sajad Gharibi announced that he plans to head to Syria and “beat up ISIS,” BBC Persia reported on Friday.
Gharibi, who weighs approximately 350 pounds and has amassed an equally formidable Instagram following, says he hopes to aid Iran and Syrian troops battling ISIS and protect Shiite mosques from the Sunni militant group’s destructive path.
Since ISIS’ rise, combatants have destroyed dozens of historic, culturally significant religious sites throughout Iraq and Syria, many of them Shiite. UNESCO director general Irina Bokova has called this systematic destructionan act of “cultural cleansing,” meant to erase cultural identities that do not correspond with ISIS’ ideology.
Gharibi’s desire to aid in the Iranian fight against ISIS comes after around two years of the Islamic Republic’s intervention in the embattled region.
Iran, composed primarily of Shia Muslims, has come to the aid of regions under the threat of ISIS since the summer of 2014 — via providing financial and technical support to the Syrian military, sending technical advisers to the Iraqi government or providing weapons to Kurdish troops, who have their own motivations to squash the Islamic State. Some media outlets claim that Iran has had combat troops to Iraq since 2014, which Iran denies.
Despite pledging his loyalty to the Assad regime on Instagram, Gharibi denied assertions that he is actually an infamous ISIS executioner, known as the “Bulldozer,” who as his name conveys has a similar body type and was captured by Syrian troops this June.
No word on when Gharibi will actually head to Syria. If his Instagram is any indicator, it may be soon — on Tuesday he posted several photos of himself in army fatigues:





Image source: Instagram
This article was originally published in 2016 By Savannah Cox and is frequently updated

US Coalition Forces Bombed Civilians With Chemical Weapons — Media Silent




















US Coalition Admits Using Chemical Weapons Against Civilians in Iraq.
(TFTP) Earlier this month, multiple reports surfaced of US-led coalition forces in Mosul, Iraq and Raqqa, Syria, using the incendiary chemical weapon, white phosphorus, on civilians. For over a week, the US government and the coalition at large have remained silent on the issue — until now.
In an error that will likely get him much backlash, in an interview with NPR, New Zealand Brig. Gen. Hugh McAslan, and member of the US-coalition has admitted — for the first time — to using white phosphorus during operations in the Iraqi city of Mosul.
“We have utilized white phosphorous to screen areas within West Mosul to get civilians out safely,” McAslan told NPR on Tuesday.
Instead of questioning the horrid nature of the chemical weapons use on civilians, NPR echoed the general’s sentiment and noted that 28,000 civilians have managed to escape. While that may be true, countless others were injured or suffered horrifying deaths.




 White phosphorus is described as an “incendiary and toxic chemical substance used as a filler in a number of different munitions that can be employed for a variety of military purposes.”
The chemical was banned internationally after the 1980 Protocol on Incendiary Weapons restricted the “use of incendiary weapons as a means or method of warfare during armed conflict.”
The use of chemical weapons is clearly prohibited in international armed conflicts. The International Committee of the Red Cross noted that “employing asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and all analogous liquids, materials or devices is listed in the Statute of the International Criminal Court as a war crime.”
While deploying incendiary weapons against residential areas is banned under Protocol III of the Convention on Conventional Weapons (CCW), the two other uses — smoke screens and signals — are not, which allows the hypocritical US, to keep such munitions in their arsenal and use them. It is through this loophole that the US claims the right to deploy these deadly weapons on towns.
On November 30, 2005, General Peter Pace stated that white phosphorus munitions were a “legitimate tool of the military” used to illuminate targets and create smokescreens, saying “It is not a chemical weapon. It is an incendiary.” However, the general is wrong. As soon as white phosphorus is deployed against people, it becomes a chemical weapon.
A chemical weapon can be “any chemical which through its chemical action on life processes can cause death, temporary incapacitation or permanent harm.”
White phosphorus remains very dangerous even when not deliberately used to start fires or attack humans. Submunitions can ignite days after deployment and remain a hazard for a city. Injuries caused by the chemical can burn to the bone and are prone to reigniting if a piece of the phosphorus remaining in the wound is exposed to air when a dressing is changed.
“No matter how white phosphorus is used, it poses a high risk of horrific and long-lasting harm in crowded cities like Raqqa and Mosul and any other areas with concentrations of civilians,” said Steve Goose, arms director at Human Rights Watch.
The US claims of using white phosphorus as a smoke screen or signal ring hollow when assessing the damage reported on the ground in Syria and Iraq.
Just as the rights groups warned, civilian casualties were, in fact, a reality from the coalition’s deployment of white phosphorus.
Xinhua News, China’s state press agency, reported last week that Tens of civilians were killed on Thursday when the U.S.-led airstrikes targeted Syria’s northern city of Raqqa with white phosphorus,” citing a report from Syria’s Sham FM radio.
Russia’s Riafan.ru reported that “Coalition forces led by the United States of America shell Raqqa and suburbs of white phosphorus munitions,” citing reports on Twitter, which said the U.S.-backed coalition conducted 20 air raids.



 Although the total number of civilian deaths has not been entirely confirmed, early reports suggest that nearly 50 people were killed.
“Horrific civilian harm from previous use of white phosphorus has generated public outrage and this latest use of white phosphorus underscores the urgent need for states to strengthen international law relating to incendiary weapons,” HRW’s Goose said.
Although NPR happened to have the general admit to them US forces are using white phosphorus, no other mainstream outlet in America has picked up this bombshell story.
Their silence shows their complicit nature in covering up the alleged war crimes of the West.
“US-led forces should take all feasible precautions to minimize civilian harm when using white phosphorus in Iraq and Syria,” Goose said of the situation. However, from the reports on the ground, that appears not to be the case.






View image on Twitter


In the video below, the US-led coalition is dropping white phosphorus bombs on Western Mosul. Watch for yourself and decide whether or not it was being used as a ‘tool’ to allow civilians to escape.




Sunday, June 11, 2017

An Air Force Intelligence Officer Reveals That An Extraterrestrial Was Shot & Killed











Above is a picture George Filer III at the Citizens Hearing on Disclosure.
Extraterrestrials (ET’s) have been visiting us for a long time, and government officials and witness testimonies have consistently reiterated this to the public. Mainstream media has sort of made ET/UFO phenomena into a joke through heavy propaganda, which is strange given the fact that there’s so much evidence in support of it.
In reality, we are only a small fraction within a multiverse, so even if you do question the official government documents and other evidence in support of ETs, it still wouldn’t really make sense for Earth to be the only planet that houses life.
A video testimony of Air Force Intelligence Major George A. Filer III featured on Sirius Disclosure revealed details of a high-ranking military ET cover-up. In the interview, Major Filer explained that a military officer shot and killed an extraterrestrial after a UFO landed.
I’m not saying that this man’s story is 100% true, but I am suggesting that you watch his testimony and keep an open mind. This is not the first time a government/military official has come forward to discuss ETs, and I doubt it will be the last.
UFO/ET information was classified for quite some time, and still is; but, only in recent years has the government shed more light on this thanks to the declassification of several UFO documents.
For example, Mike Gravel, a former Democratic Senator, explained“Something is monitoring the planet, and they are monitoring it very cautiously, because we are a very warlike planet.”
One of the most revealing testimonies was provided by Paul Hellyer, former Canadian Defence Minister:
In one of the cases during the cold war, 1961, there were about 50 UFOs in formation flying South from Russia across Europe. The Supreme Allied Commander was very concerned and was about ready to press the panic button when they turned around and went back over the North Pole. They decided to do an investigation and they investigated for three years and they decided that with absolute certainty that four different species, at least, have been visiting this planet for thousands of years. There’s been a lot more activity in the past two decades, especially since we invented the atomic bomb. They are very concerned about that and if we will use it again, because the whole cosmos is in unity and it affects not just us but other people in the cosmos. They’re very much afraid that we might start using atomic weapons again and this would be very bad for us, and them also. (source)
Even the infamous Doctor Edgar Mitchell, the 6th man to walk on the moon, spoke out about ETs, saying, “Yes there have been crashed craft, and bodies recovered. . . . We are not alone in the universe, they have been coming here for a long time. . . . I happen to be privileged enough to be in on the fact that we have been visited on this planet, and the UFO phenomenon is real.” (source)(source)(source)

WHAT HAPPENED TO THE ALLEGED “ALIEN” AT FORT DIX

In the 1970s, Major George Filer was privy to some extremely sensitive information from the military. While at McGuire Air Force Base in New Jersey, Filer found out that an extraterrestrial being had been shot at Fort Dix and died on the tarmac.
The UFO landed, or possibly crashed, and then a military policeman came across an “alien,” and so he pulled out a gun and shot the being. Even Major Filer was skeptical when he heard the term “alien,” but he was reassured that the being in question was in fact “from outerspace.” The body was then captured by the military and taken to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.
His testimony seemed fairly vague when it comes to how the UFO came to be on the ground, which begs the question: Could the military have shot it down? In many cases, they are ordered to do so, so this wouldn’t be surprising.
Major Filey was originally told he would have to brief a room of his colleagues on what happened, but then he was told to change the story and cover up the entire thing.
Filey explained, “He essentially saw a small body that could’ve been like a child and seemed to have a larger than normal head.”
“Many of the key personnel on the base at that time who had a connection to this were quickly transferred… If you knew something, they tended to split you up, so to speak, so you couldn’t talk about it.”
Here’s the full video testimony:

FINAL THOUGHTS

Can you imagine if you were a whistleblower who finally decided to come forward after decades of working for the military? We need to have compassion for these people and understand that they very well could be telling the truth, instead of just assuming they’re lying.
In addition, an important question to ask ourselves is: Why do we always resort to violence when it comes to ETs? Many of the ET/UFO encounters the military has had involved violence, whether they shot them down or poked and prodded at these beings in the name of science. However, we could ask this same question in regards to our human interactions and international relations, as we often resort to hostility and violence amongst our own race.
ETs and UFOs should no longer be a “taboo” topic. There is hard evidence and government documents proving their existence. If you’d like to learn more, check out the Exopolitics section of our website!